Automation within the Power Platform
Many technical service providers already work with Microsoft 365. Automation within the Power Platform builds on that foundation: work orders, reporting and approval flows run inside the existing environment, under the management and security settings already in place.
The platform is not the right choice for every requirement. This page describes when it fits, what determines the cost and how to prevent an automation becoming unmanageable after two years.
When it fits, and when it does not
Is the Power Platform a fit?
The work matches what the platform does well, and data stays within the organisation’s own environment.
If the platform is not a fit, an alternative is proposed. A platform choice that proves unsustainable produces no saving.
Components and application
Power Automate
Processing of work orders, document flows and approvals. Integration between planning systems, accounting and document management.
Power Apps
Input screens for field service and back office, aligned with the existing process rather than the reverse.
SharePoint and Dataverse
Storage of documents and structured data. The choice between them is determined by the data model and the licensing situation, and is substantiated in advance.
Microsoft 365 Copilot and AI Builder
Text processing, classification and document recognition within the organisation’s own tenant, for situations where external AI services are not permitted.
Licensing and cost
Most cost overruns in Power Platform projects do not occur during development but at the point of rollout. Four factors determine the outcome.
One connector changes everyone’s licence
A flow that uses only standard connectors is covered by Microsoft 365. Add a single premium connector and everyone who uses the application needs an additional licence.
Management, handover and continuity
An automation running under a personal account stops working the moment the account owner leaves the organisation. This is the most common cause of failure in existing Power Platform implementations.
What happens when the creator leaves?
An automation always runs under an account. Choose the owner and see what happens when that employee leaves.
Standard practice therefore includes:
Handover to the organisation is the default position. Ongoing management is available but is not a condition for continuity.
Working under strict data restrictions
Industrial and maritime clients frequently prohibit the use of external AI services. Documents must not leave the organisation’s environment and external processing services may not be used.
In these situations the entire process is built within the Microsoft environment, with Microsoft 365 Copilot as the AI layer. This imposes limitations on what an AI component can achieve, which are established in advance rather than during development.
This approach is applied in an ongoing project in the maritime sector, in which service reports produced by technical personnel are automatically converted into client-ready documents within the client’s own environment.
A 30-minute intro. No strings attached.
Discuss which process needs attention. You’ll then get an honest picture of what automation will and won’t deliver.
Book an intro call